The Pragati Leadership Blog

Let's talk Leadership!

Building a Culture of Learning and Engagement – Part 2

Continuing with the ideas I had shared in my previous post, Building a Culture of Learning and Engagement, we need to find processes for learning and engagement that engage the mind-body-spirit of our employees. This would help to make employee engagement not just an intervention but a way of life in our organizations.

I received some excellent comments from readers to that post, and now I’m sharing some ways in which I believe we can achieve our goal:

  1. Creating a purpose driven work-force
  2. Including conversational processes in Learning
  3. Having a ‘Jugnu’ approach
  1. Creating a purpose driven work-force: Purpose can be described as the reason for our existence. Organizations are not always purpose driven but they are definitely vision driven and have clear goals and strategies. As part of alignment, we do help people see how the organizational vision connects to their role.Suppose we flip this approach. Supposing we start with each employee instead. Get each employee to identify their personal purpose and values – what matters to them – why do they exist – what makes them wake up with a spring in their step – what makes their eyes shine? Questions that perhaps they have never considered.Jobs don’t really require an answer to these, do they? Yet, a purpose statement helps us to understand the reason we exist, live and work. If we facilitate this discovery for employees, we build a sense of confidence and self-discovery in them. Only then should we link it with their organizational roles and the vision of the organization. We at Pragati Leadership strongly believe that this would enable a realizing of potential and power within people and they would then be able to be better engaged and involved with themselves and the organization. If I don’t understand myself and what I want, how will I understand what the organization aspires to achieve and my role in the same?

    Giving people the freedom, resources and autonomy to be able to pursue their personal purpose at work (along with their organizational role) would help to bring out both positive energy and involvement. Hindustan Petroleum has done this in a remarkable way with great success.

  2. Including Conversational Processes in Learning: Most of our OD and HR interventions are highly structured and well planned. They enable sharing of knowledge and building of skills.Yet it is informal conversations that lead to collaboration, connection and co-creation. Informal conversations lead to sharing of ideas, best practices and innovation. Organizations need to create spaces and forums to operationalize this. Two such conversational processes are: Open Space Technology (OST) and World Cafe. What is common among both of these is that a theme is chosen and people voluntarily sign up for areas or issues they are passionate about. This leads to learning and passionate ownership of actions. Many companies have experimented with regular monthly or quarterly forums where OST is introduced to employees . This has led to new ideas being generated, and more importantly,  people coming forward voluntarily to take responsibility for their implementation. These processes are sustainable, cost effective and require no external intervention. These are critical ongoing OD interventions that can build engagement and learning.
  3. Having a Jugnu Approach: The word ‘Jugnu’ means ‘fireflies’. Fireflies glow in the dark. Where there is darkness, they show the light. In an organizational context, Jugnus refers to those people who show more learning luminosity than others. In order to enhance the vibrancy, learning and luminosity of an organization, the HR/L&OD team can identify a cadre of employees called ‘Jugnus’ or ‘I-Catalysts’. These are people who are internal change agents for learning and engagement. They are naturally interested in sharing, learning, have a positive and optimistic approach and are natural communicators and magnets for others. These people can be identified through seeking nominations and selected using a check-list. With some degree of I-Catalyst training, they can become the extended arm of HR/L & D in order to catalyze learning among employees. I-Catalysts would typically be line managers .They would help to promote learning among employees by organizing and facilitating informal learning e.g. brown bag workshops, best practice sharing, debates, peer assist sessions, films, storytelling etc. Research has shown that the trend in learning is that organizations are moving away from formal training to informal learning where they don’t need to be in a classroom for picking up new skills etc. I-Catalysts can spearhead this process of informal learning within the organization.

8976832010_b93c773569_c

When a culture of purpose, conversation and learning gets created, it automatically leads to greater employee engagement and involvement. People’s strengths and talents are used better. There is higher ideation and innovation. People meet across departments and silos and there is a naturally higher collaboration. There is less fear and more joy. More importantly employee engagement is no longer an HR intervention, rather it becomes each person’s priority. When this happens, the goal of the HR department has truly been achieved.

Are some of these ideas adopted at your organization? I would love to hear readers’ experiences and share knowledge so that we all learn and grow.

by Anu Wakhlu

Leave a comment »

Building a Culture of Learning and Engagement

In today’s dynamic environment, the Learning and HR function faces unprecedented challenges, both internal and external, which impact the culture and working environment of their organizations. External challenges are related to the fast pace of change and a highly ambiguous environment which demands innovative and speedy responses continuously. The slowdown of economies the world over, uncertain political affiliations, global warming, rising unemployment, religious biases and prejudices further complicate the already dynamic external environment.

All these have an impact on organizational realities. Business results are not as healthy as they should be. This immediately leads to a freeze on budgets, hiring and cutting down on all ‘frills’. Sometimes these ‘frills’ include learning and development budgets too, and training programs get slashed. This in turn may have an impact on employee engagement and involvement, as it creates a perception that ‘my organization does not care for me’. Along with news of people being laid off, this may create an environment of fear and anxiety. This is not very conducive to enhancing and sustaining employee engagement.

Paradoxically it is precisely in times of uncertainty and recession that we need creative and breakthrough ideas that can help us navigate the change around us. While ideas may exist, they are often not visible and available to Business Leaders. The interesting thing is that while we are looking for new ideas and paradigms everywhere, the infinite reservoir of creative energy that contributes to these ideas is waiting to be tapped right under our nose. It’s the untapped potential and creativity of the people in the organization! While we do need the right strategy, processes, finances etc. to make a successful turnaround of our business, it is finally people who make the difference. It is said that technology makes things possible, but people make things happen!

What kind of people though? We need people who are engaged and involved with the organization and its vision and goals. Engagement has been defined as a state of emotional and intellectual commitment to an organization. Team members who are involved and connected with the company will add value to their roles, contribute positively to the growth of the company (even beyond their stipulated roles) and continue to stay in the company. These are the kind of employees every company dreams of having!  The reality, sadly, is often different, as seen in many research studies:

  • 70% of employees who lack confidence in the abilities of senior leadership are not fully engaged: Dale Carnegie Employee Engagement Study (2015)
  • 80% of employees dissatisfied with their direct manager are disengaged: Dale Carnegie Employee Engagement Study (2015)
  • 60% of employees lack the elements required to be highly engaged: Towers Watson 2014 Global Workforce Study

The drivers for building engagement are many-e.g. Compensation, quality of life, work-life balance, work environment, leadership etc. Some of these are dependent on Management Policies and outside of our locus of control. But a key driver that falls within the ambit of an HR professional is providing a learning environment for the employees of the organization.

Employees will stay on in an organization that provides opportunities for learning and growing. This is a fundamental human need. We all recognize that in a dynamic business environment, continuous learning and change is the only competitive advantage we have. For companies to survive, we need to adapt and learn fast. We need to innovate. At any point in time, our rate of learning and renewal has to be faster than the rate of change we experience. If we don’t change, we are in danger of becoming obsolete. All this is hardly new! What perhaps may be new is that it’s not just learning and adapting that is required. We also need enthusiasm and positive energy which creates the drive for learning. Steve Drake says “Knowledge is power and enthusiasm pulls the switch”. Positive energy refers to the curiosity and enthusiasm that need to go hand in hand with learning to make it a vibrant and energizing experience.

As HR Professionals, we all work towards building a culture of learning in our organizations. We do this in many ways e.g., creating training calendars, defining competencies – assessing them and helping people to build these, job rotations, etc. Most of these are scientific, traditional structured approaches to building engagement and learning. These do work (!) and therefore need to continue to be deployed.

What we also need to do is bring in other processes for learning and engagement that engage the mind-body-spirit of our employees. This would help to make employee engagement not just an intervention but a way of life in our organizations.

While I would love to share what I believe are the best ways to achieve this, I would also like to hear from readers what they feel can be done in this direction. Please add your comments to this post, and I will write a second post shortly about my learnings as well as yours.

By Anu Wakhlu

1 Comment »

CEOs! 3 Ways to Get ‘Boarding Completed’ So that Your Flight can Take Off

Hundreds of people are gathered in an airport terminal, ready for the journey that will take them to their destination, shuffling along the passageways. It’s only when every single passenger is on-board that the crew can confirm that ‘boarding is complete’, and the pilot can take off. If even a single passenger fails to board, the flight simply cannot take off, and no one is going anywhere.

When we work with corporate teams to build alignment and collaboration, we see that things work in a very similar way. As a CEO, you’ve defined your vision, targets, and strategic focus areas. But it’s crucial for you to know, has every single team member really understood and committed to these? Is ‘boarding complete’ so that the flight to your goals can take off?

There are three important dimensions to this ‘boarding’ in the corporate world, and it’s important to get each one of them right

Goals: Have you clearly articulated the goals and does everyone understand them? Are the goals SURE – Simple, Understandable, Remembered and Executable? Often, we find individuals, who haven’t understood or committed themselves to the organizational goals, so haven’t boarded your flight.

Culture and Alignment: Next comes your culture – has everyone bought into that? Every individual has beliefs, values and patterns, and often this means that they believe that things will always be a certain way. This can come in the way of believing that things could be different or better. Coming back to our flight analogy, this is a bit like a boarding gate full of people with armfuls and armfuls of hand baggage. When everyone comes together into the narrow alleys, they just won’t be able to enter. Passengers need to shed some of their baggage, or someone needs to help them.

That’s just what we do in our corporate training sessions, resolve those beliefs – the myths and taboos, so that people can move towards future goals.

Seen from the individual’s perspective; unless my beliefs are either aligned with the leaders, or dissolved, or until you answer my questions and resolve my misgivings, I’m simply not boarding your plane.

As the leader, or pilot of the plane, the CEO needs to be closely tuned with these aspects, and cannot simply assume that everyone will come on board.

That’s where our work in creating alignment and facilitating collaboration comes in. We design programs and then use methods that ensure that ‘boarding is complete’, and not through enforcement, but willingly.

For instance, let’s look at myths and taboos that each person carries in their own mind. We observe the group and pick up on these, and we may find that there’s a lack of alignment between the leaders’ convictions and the team members’ beliefs. So we create a trustworthy platform, where anonymously people can say, ‘you know, that’s your belief, but I don’t buy that. Can you share that in a way that makes sense to me?’, and provide an opportunity for better understanding and alignment.

When it comes to a concept, such as a vision statement, we often use models and analogies that make them more real and less abstract for team members to understand.

Communication: To resolve misgivings, we create an honest, transparent communication forum. So, for instance, participants write their queries, we facilitate that, then leaders sit in the ‘hot seat’ and answer them one by one. In one company we saw the breakdown of alignment – the leave policy wasn’t clear to all, profit sharing was not happening and people didn’t know why, action taken on information collected at exit interviews wasn’t visible, HR was not thanking people. Clear action items emerged that could resolve these issues and people committed to them.

We design programs to overcome the difficulties in getting everyone on board. We identify the hindrances, and design programs. Alignment and collaboration are not achieved by just playing games or doing some outdoor activities. They result from heart-to-heart conversations, processes where we help to dissolve beliefs, honest and transparent feedback, and process changes. We bring a fresh perspective, a structured approach and create the magic of real collaboration, consistently.

Readers, would love to hear from you if you have faced these situations, and how you are managing them. Do reach out to me or post a comment.

By Vivek Yatnalkar

Leave a comment »

Developing a second line of Leaders

Leadership is ultimately about developing other Leaders.There are many qualities of Leadership that we seek in our leaders that are highly valued eg Integrity,Business Acumen,Power of Vision etc. These are certainly important .However the primary task of Leadership is to develop other leaders and therefore build organization capability for the present and the future.

The role of  Leaders is to create successors for their  role and that of other critical roles in the organization.However ,in most cases this is the one aspect of the Leadership role that receives scant attention. At the organizational level also,this remains one of the areas of challenge.  In a recent study conducted by Bersin and Associates for over 700 HR and L & D Managers- the number one challenge they all stated was “filling gaps in the leadership pipeline.” And yet there is overwhelming evidence that organizations who have a depth of leadership deliver better business results! In another study conducted by Hewitt Associates (the TCFL study),a clear co-relation was identified between building leaders and achieving significant business targets.

 

Companies are realizing that building leaders and developing potential successors for critical roles in the organization is of strategic importance for the organization’s growth.Indian companies have started putting this on top of their strategic people initiatives. In a recent study of  organizations that have robust practices of developing leaders in the APAC region, five of twelve companies were Indian! These included organizations such as ICICI Bank,Aditya Birla Group,Infosys,Wipro,Hindustan Unilever Ltd.

The role of developing Leaders from within is the responsibility of three broad stakeholders:

1.The CEO and the Board of Directors : The role of most CEO’s is to grow the business and ensure operational excellence. What attracts their attention therefore in most cases is the strategic planning process,future growth prospects,operational optimization etc. The role of the CEO in building leaders is often delegated to the HR/L&D functional head.And yet,this is probably the most important aspect of the CEO’s role:building the human capital for the organization to grow and flourish. The role of the CEO is therefore to be the catalyst and champion for Leadership Development at all levels.This would start by personally identifying and developing as many potential CEO candidates for his/her role. It would then continue by offering opportunities to these candidates to learn,excel and grow in their exposure to the business by personal coaching.

Similiarly, there are very few Boards who would have the agenda of CEO and senior Leadership development as part of their regular Board agenda.In cases,where the Board asks for reports on the Leadership development as much as they ask about profitability and strategic alliances,the agenda of People development gets a firm footing in the company.

  1. The role of HR/Learning and Development Function: Development of Talent and specifically development of leaders in the organization is one of the critical areas that the Human Resources and the Learning and Development Function of organizations needs to pay attention to.It would start by identifying Leadership Competencies for the present business as well as the future. People across the organization would then need to be mapped on this. Interestingly while most organizations do have a competency framework,most of the time this is limited to functional competencies or then soft skills.Clear Leadership attributes and behaviours are not always identified.

An integrated Leadership development framework and programmes need then to be institutionalized and implemented.It is very important to make this a business initiative and not just a HR initiative. Interventions for developing Leaders need to be done at all levels in the organization .This would ensure that the leadership capability for all gets enhanced .This would then result in a better leadership band-width in the organization.Special programmes for high potential /emerging leaders also need to be run as accelerated leadership development programmes.These would need to have opportunities for the leaders to experiment with new business opportunities /challenges beyond their existing roles.

Internal Coaches and Mentors are helpful in developing internal Leaders since they can support and accelerate the process of tacit knowledge and experience sharing.The Essar Group in India has based their entire Leadership Development on the practice of Coaching and Mentoring .

3.The role of Individual Leaders:    Each Manager and Leader in an organization needs to own their role of being mentors and people developers for their own teams. In our own experience of working with over——–  people in——- organizations,we have experienced that when line managers assume the role  of HR managers of their own teams,they are able to develop leaders for their functions. This can happen when People Development and Leadership development is seen as their primary role.Getting results is a by-product of this primary role.Such Leaders pay attention to processes like the Performance Management System by recognizing its importance in tracking both the potential and performance .Similarly they are  interested in the competency building of their teams and are closely associated with the training and learning initiatives for their teams.They would sit with their teams prior to them being sent for training and spell out their expectations.After the training,they would track the improvements the person is making on the job and give feedback. Such Leaders would also spend time with their team on a one on one basis,providing coaching and support to their colleagues. They would ensure that the team has exposure to new concepts/best practices of other/similiar industries so that they are familiar with the external environment.

They are passionate about their roles as”people developers” and would spend more than 50-60 % of their time on this aspect of their role. Delegation would ensure that they are building capability within their own function.

This would require leaders to be supremely confident of themselves and their capability.Only leaders who are secure and who have a purpose in their life,would want to develop other leaders in their own functions and teams.

Organizations led by wise and visionary leaders and supported by a proactive and credible HR/L & D function   would create a cadre of leaders who promote and building leaders from within.

By Anu Wakhlu

Leave a comment »

What Keeps CEOs Awake?

I often get asked by colleagues “What do CEO’s worry about?” This is usually in the context of facilitating CXO level workshops. Well, just as any other Management personnel, CEOs both worry and are happy! Things that are certainly on their dashboards are:

  • Business results
  • Sustainability of the business
  • Right talent in the company
  • Brand visibility/ respect for the company
  • Governance etc.

Simply articulated – what’s on the worry slate is current operations and future readiness of the business. CEOs have to constantly manage their time and attention between these two. While it sounds like something that can be easily balanced and managed, it is often a challenge for many of us. Most of our attention and executive time gets caught in the operational aspects of the business. I have often wondered why it is so? We all know the importance of having a long-term focus – we teach it, mentor people around it and champion it to others. However in practice, the constant fires that operations throw up keep most CEOs fairly busy. There is some sort of gratification or sense of importance that one gets out of being in the “fire of action”!

Long term actions and thinking therefore often gets left only to strategy sessions at the end of the year rather than an ongoing practice.
One of the core issues that CEOs have to deal with is their perceptual and thinking blocks in this area. Why is it that we don’t spend time on what we know is important for us as CXOs and also for our business? It could be due to three aspects:

  • Seeing
  • Carving time
  • Swift action

Seeing is all about knowing what is the most mission critical area of focus for us -not what enchants and seduces us – but what we need to do. With the kind of information overload that is there plus multiple pressures and ‘fires’, it is very easy to forget to ‘see’ what we need to attend to. Having the most important aspects of our roles visible to us is a key enabler. Having it in an attractive, visual format is even more helpful. Like a mind-map or a vision-board.

Carving time is what Meg Wheatley calls ‘create a stake’. Consider yourself as the most important customer and make time for the area of work that is important for you. This may involve blocking time with other  colleagues, stakeholders to create a winning proposition, having heart-felt conversations with colleagues, meeting potential JV partners ,or just revisiting old notes and ideas for a new strategy. Unless we carve and block time for this, it will not happen.

The third aspect is swift execution of what has been decided. Its only when we act, that something will emerge. In a VUCA world, where things and product lines change so fast, we cannot afford to take too long to act . Quick and swift action is what produces results.
This is the world of CEOs and what might support them in running profitable, sustainable and joyful businesses.

By Anu Wakhlu

Leave a comment »

The Always of Leadership

How many of you have participated in a 360 degree feedback process at work?   For leaders, receiving feedback from colleagues feels like report-card day! If you think about it, it is surely a report card of behavior perception i.e. how colleagues perceive their behavior and what conclusions they draw from that (as is evident in the verbatim comments that form a part of such reports). It is very interesting to observe how people respond to feedback that they get and I must say I have really seen it all – from gratitude and enthusiasm, to surprise and shock; from calm and knowing acceptance to utter disbelief and rejection.

THE DREADED RATING SCALE

The design of such instruments is very telling…there are a set of behavior statements and a set of options from which one has to tick the appropriate one e.g.: A statement like “listens patiently to others’ ideas” can be rated as Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Usually or Always. Needless to say, most people rate themselves as Always (5/5) while their colleagues rate them as “Sometimes” or “Usually”..much to their surprise and chagrin.

ALWAYS: THE HALLMARK OF LEADERSHIP

On a recent such assignment, I debriefed about 25-30 people on their feedback reports…and I soon realized that there was magic hidden in the word “Always”. It set my mind in motion and I reflected back to the leaders that I have personally witnessed/ worked with in my career.

It became clear to me that whatever a leader “Always” did, became the “Hallmark” of her Brand of Leadership. For example:

Mr. S was such a time stickler that he “always” insisted on adherence to schedule…Soon his team members knew that if his time was blocked then punctuality was key. I remember once people arrived 50 minutes late for a 60 minute meeting. He spent the remaining 10 minutes with them and that was that!

Ms B “always” greeted visitors with a smile, asked them about their family, offered a cup of tea/coffee and made them feel comfortable. She even ensured that there was no sun in the face, by pulling down the blinds herself, if need be. Only then did she get down to discussing the business matter at hand. She was known for Warmth, for being a good person, “always”.

IS “ALWAYS” ALWAYS POSSIBLE?

Most organizations have an in-house model of leadership competencies i.e. they have a long list of behaviors which leaders in the company are expected to demonstrate. Funnily enough, the underlying assumption is that every Leader must score an “Always” on ALL desirable “Leadership Behaviors.” Is that really possible? Obviously, such an assumption is really not founded in realism of any kind! This is hardly a Class XII board exam where a score of aggregate 95% + seems to have 1000s of claimants. Human behavior is a different ball-game!

Haven’t we all seen Leaders who are very competent at, say, driving initiatives, but not so good in future planning, or colleagues who are excellent at client relationships but maybe not in peer relationships? The more I work with leaders; one thing becomes crystal clear to me – that each leader has her Hallmark, her Brand which is created by consistently demonstrating a certain set of behaviors in multiple interactions with multiple people. By corollary, there are also many things that the same leader will never be able to get an “Always” rating for. And that’s OK.

WHAT IS YOUR HALLMARK STYLE?

Ultimately the key to Success and Excellence for you as a leader is really to pick a few actions/ behaviors that drive your team to be motivated, engaged and performance oriented and then consistently demonstrate that behavior, day in and day out.. like a signature style! On those critical behaviors, you can claim an “Always” blindfolded and soon you will be dancing your way up the business and happiness graphs.

Easier said than done, of course! How you go about building your Signature Style is another article for another day… but the starting point is to look at yourself dispassionately and identify those desirable leadership behaviors that you are automatically drawn to…where moving from a “Usually” to an “Always” seems like no effort at all. As with most things to do with self development, self awareness is the first baby step!

By Yoshita Sharma

Leave a comment »

Performance Reviews – Both sides of the coin

In the years that I’ve been facilitating workshops, the one topic that all the participants are unhappy with are their ‘appraisals’. It’s appears to be a fairly universal source of anguish.

Why is this so? Allow me to share a few of my observations.

  1. The purpose of ‘Appraisal’ discussions seems to be misunderstood. They’re seen by employees as an excuse for the manager to confine them into a certain ‘rating’ bracket, to find fault with them, to negotiate salary raises or promotion opportunities. Many managers often have a similar view and are worried that the intended conversation will become an argument. The purpose of this discussion is NOT to give a rating. The purpose of this discussion is to talk with employees about their performance during a certain period and to set goals for the coming period. The purpose is to help employees find ways to better their performance. It is an opportunity to demonstrate to employees that their manager is committed to their growth and development.
  2. If you think about it, even the term ‘appraise’ can be mildly offensive, in its true sense it means judging or evaluating. Most people don’t like being judged or even evaluated. They fell they are treated less as people and more as inanimate objects. This whole business of ratings has further muddied the waters. They’re Performance Review Discussions, not Rating Conversations! Unless employees and managers see that, these conversations are going to be fraught with mistrust and heartburn. It’s important to explain to employees that ratings only come after the discussion and to also explain the science behind the rating to them. It is not right for managers to say, “It’s the same process for everyone”. That is not the same thing as explaining the science behind it. The science of rating is also an inexact one, and many large organizations are doing away with commonly used rating methods.
  3. The discussions take place only yearly or half yearly! The intervening period is usually devoid of any discussions around performance! This furthers the perception of it being a mere Rating exercise instead of it being an opportunity to help employees improve their performance.
  4. The culture of the organization also makes a huge difference. During my tenure at a reputed IT/ITES organization, I was introduced to a great policy. Employees were informed that if they were dissatisfied with their Performance Review, they could dispute it with a panel. This helped ensure that the Performance Review was a fair one and that the manager did a good job at it. If a manager hadn’t done a good job, the panel’s ruling would help her/ him understand what they could do better next time. Conversely, there are organizations where senior management publicly announces to the employees that 30% of their Review will depend on whether their manager ‘likes’ them. Statements like this do nothing to build trust and change the perception that Performance Reviews are ‘pointless’.

If you’re concerned about Performance Review Discussions in your organization, just keep in mind the purpose of these discussions. That will go a long way in ensuring that these conversations are a lot easier than they as they are currently made out to be.

Looking for a smart PRD at your organization, get in touch with us at myneed@pragatileadership.com or call +91 20 66462900, +91 9049000534

by Aman Zaidi

Leave a comment »

How Mindfulness Benefits Business

A few days after I had conducted a workshop on “Mindfulness for Excellence” for the Top Sales Leaders in an IT Company, I ran into one of the participants at the Pune airport. He was enthusiastic  about the huge benefits that come from being present to our innermost core of Awareness.

I asked him what he specifically found to be of value, and he shared some thoughts. He said he had evolved to be:

  • More conscious of  his surroundings, other people and  opportunities to serve
  • More relaxed, energized, inspired  and healthy
  • Clearer in  thought leading to more creative and agile decision making
  • More Confident  and Present ; and
  • Better in interpersonal relations.

The beauty about meditation is that only one single practice yields  these all-round results. You don’t need to follow separate courses of action for achieving them.

This is not surprising, considering that the most important instrument available to Leaders is the Mind.  The Mind  mediates everything that the person aspires for, perceives, feels, acts on, and achieves. It determines the quality of decision making, the person’s enthusiasm, his or her concern for others, oneself and the environment.

The mind provides the larger context  and purpose for the work of all Leaders. The quality of their thoughts and affects what they  create. The Mind is the foundation for all of life….the wellspring of all that happens or does not happen. The “collective mind” shapes the destiny of organisations and nations.

The true work of a Leader is to shape the minds of followers.

You can lead  others only  if you lead  their thought processes.

It is impossible to lead other peoples’ thought processes if one cannot govern one’s own!

Meditation and Mindfulness  enable the Leader to access a deeper Awareness which is beyond the mind. This leads to a spontaneous improvement in many dimensions of life. By paying attention to what is happening in the now, the quality of ones responses are more appropriate and creative. On days that I meditate in the morning, I find my work moving faster, with less distractions , and my interactions with people are far more joyful and easy.

There is a huge amount of research on the benefits of Mindfulness and Meditation. Even as I was writing this piece, an article on the Business Value of Mindfulness came into my Inbox!  Companies like Google have started using Yoga  and Meditation to increase productivity.  The evidence is loud and clear.

When Pragati Leadership talked of Meditation for Leaders 27 years ago, many eyebrows would rise. Today, there is ample research evidence to show that it makes practical business sense.

Considering that Joy, Peace and Freedom is what man’s search is all about, Meditation simply says you can BE all these right now. And this makes huge personal and business sense.

Perhaps, communing with the Timeless is the best investment of 20 minutes of my time.

by Arun Wakhlu

Leave a comment »

Spir-IT Summit Coming Up: My Thoughts

India’s Transformation will depend upon three ITs :  Information Technology, Inspired Teaching and Inner Transformation.

India’s Transformation will show the way for International Transformation.

A closer  look at the IT Industry in India shows a pressing need for Inspiration, Integration and Innovation.

We need to see a thriving of Wellness in all areas.

At the heart of a thriving IT industry is thriving people. People who are  healthy, joyous and professionally excellent in their domains. They work in green and nourishing environments with some of the best talent you can find. The IT industry  also needs some people to collaborate across domains/ areas of expertise and traditional verticals.

Maybe even across different organisations which specialize in different areas.

This will enable them to co-create Innovative Solutions which deliver more value at lower costs for global clients.

Pragati Leadership has always believed that there are vast Inner resources in all of us which can be tapped.

Research on Meditation and Presence shows direct links to higher creativity, more equanimity and better health.

The SPIR-IT summit is an opportunity to listen to the wisdom of gathered CXOs from the IT Industry in Pune…what has worked for them, what is their vision, and what we can all do together.

When we all work together for the well-being of people in the IT Industry, Pune will come even closer to showing the rest of India, that there is more value in collaboration and co-creation than in competing.

by Arun Wakhlu

Leave a comment »

Carpe Diem Mumbai 2015- Highlights

At Pragati Leadership’s flagship annual event, Carpe Diem, the first speaker was James Brook, Co-Founder and MD, Strengths Partnership. James spoke on the “Strengths Based Approach to Leadership”.

Mr. Brook began his talk with thoughts on the strengths based approach to leadership development, and how it challenges the traditional assumptions of leadership. He pointed out that organizations are investing so much into leadership development, that when combined, these investments equal the GDP of a small country. Yet there are not many promising leaders out there today. This is because employee engagement is deteriorating.  An indicator of failed leadership would be the many scandals that are unearthed regularly. There is a lack of longevity in the process of leadership. All this suggests that the development is not working in the right direction.

James BrookHe went on to question the audience:  ‘Is it necessary for a leader to be well rounded?’ and ‘What makes a good leader?’

He threw light on these issues by saying that it is not necessary for leaders to be well rounded. Effective leaders like Steve Jobs for example focus on their key strengths and work on them. Not all leaders have the same strengths, but the best ones build on their strengths and conquer their weaknesses to move forward.

He went on to discuss whether leaders are always right and do they know it all, then went further to say that this is not mandatory. A good leader is someone who appreciates and inculcates the importance of strengths, gives direction, goes beyond the usual and engages every team member.

From a psychology perspective, he shared that strengths are innate and developed mostly during childhood but behavior is something that can be learned and implemented strategically.

He also spoke of two very important qualities of a leader:

  • Vision
  • Sparking Engagement

In conclusion he emphasized  that stretching strengths beyond the comfort zone will help a person to grow.

The second speaker, Arun Wakhlu (Founder and Executive Chairman, Pragati Leadership) spoke about “Exploring the Core Strength of Wholesome Leadership™”.

He commenced the session with his trademark ‘Namaste’, a traditional India greeting. He went on to emphasize the importance of understanding the kind of leadership that is needed for the good of the world, and the dangers facing the world not getting the necessary attention.

Arun Wakhlu“What kind of leaders, are needed to create a truly progressive world?” He questioned.

Arun went on to share that leaders who can inspire and energize, those who are fueled on passion and energy are needed. The one thing that is not given importance, is our strengths, this is the missing element that hinders our productivity on the path of Wholesome Leadership™. Two things that need focus are Context, ie., running a business holistically and looking at the bigger picture. The second is Consciousness, ie., living in the moment, taking each day and each opportunity, one at a time. It is pointless carrying the baggage of the past and anticipating the future, for our actions are determined on the basis of how we see things.

Arun raised the question “What are the effects of this ‘baggage’ on productivity?”.  A general consensus among the members of the audience was that it caused loss of energy, time and positivity.

Arun said that this realization would result in the leader being on fire! He went on to question, “Is it possible to put others on fire if you yourself aren’t on fire? There is no vitality in the motivation of others if you aren’t motivated yourself. Looking at it from the outside will lead to freedom and clarity of thought which in turn would lead to thriving innovation.”

According to him the problem lies in the attitude. He said, “there is no focus on, or nurturing of, strengths. Negative qualities are given more attention. Awareness which is ignored, is the deepest level of consciousness.”

He stressed on the concept of “Carpe Diem”, seizing the day.  “Seize the day” he said “as you never know what can happen to you tomorrow. “

He left the audience pondering with the parting thought, “It is all about taking calculated risks.”

Leave a comment »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 885 other followers